Random Thought for Thursday 12/19/13

So it's either the types of shows I've been watching lately that must be skewing older OR it's that those ads are truly truly ubiquitous ... but I keep on hearing, over and over again, about the dangers of erections lasting more than four hours.

I haven't had a lab science class since high school, but it would seem to me that for these companies to make that claim as part of their warnings, there had to be some studies done to determine the 'n'.

Can you imagine that laboratory?  Erections of three hours?  Just fine.  Three and a half?  Seems everyone is happy.  Three and three quarters?  Yep, mostly smiles from all participants.  Four hours?  Hmmm ... the mood of our subjects seems to be changing.  Four hours and one minute?  Oh no ... danger ... danger ... pleasure's become pain for the majority of them (you know nothing's ever 100% in those studies ... there had to be at least one or two in the background waving their ... hands ... yelling out that they can keep on going ... double or nothing ... ).

[Yep ... these are the thoughts that run through my head ... aren't you glad I put them on the internet?]

PRIAPISM IS NOT A LAUGHING MATTER:
http://www.webmd.com/erectile-dysfunction/guide/erectile-dysfunction-priapism

UNLESS IT IS ... :
http://www.wolfescape.com/Humour/MedJokes.htm

THERE'S A WHOLE GENERATION OF BOYS RAISED ON THIS STUFF COMING OF AGE:
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/some-adhd-meds-cause-prolonged-erections-fda-warns-2D11761731